Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Mercedes-Benz's Latest Tech Grab Bag

Things in the car world have calmed a bit. Toyota's not on every headline, Hummer's death went pretty much unnoticed and quite a few companies posted better sales. Yawn.

So I'm going to bring something up from the recent Geneva Auto Show. It pretty got passed over, like the show itself, and no one paid attention to it.

I like to think of it as a harbinger of the future, unfortunately.

This is it, the Mercedes F800 Style.

It looks like a shark with a peace symbol shoved up its nose, and carefully creased sides.

The ass looks like a blend of BMW, VW and Mazda design cues. But it's pretty inoffensive.

It's also got a nice set of sliding doors in back.

I rather like those rear doors, personally. Entering and exiting would be much easier, and much more distinguished, in parking lots or the curb at the latest nightclub.

The interior's not bad either, really.

Granted, it looks like every other damn concept car from the last ten years, but whatever. It still looks nice.

So, really, it's a pretty standard concept. Mercedes is testing out new design cues and possible interior treatments. Nothing new there, boys and girls.

And those doors have a heretic's hope in hell of making it into the real world.

Oh, and it's supposedly powered by a nonexistent a fuel cell. Meh.

Why, then, did I call it the harbinger of the future you may ask.

Well, it's because of the technology this damn thing is showcasing. Just one in particular.

It's called DISTRONIC PLUS Traffic Jam Assist. I don't know what the hell "distronic plus" is referring to. It's probably something that the marketing department coughed up to make it sound cool, because all it's describing is a new type of cruise control.

But this new type of cruise control has a feature that I loathe with every fiber of my being. Using the cruise control's radar, the car can actually steer itself through a corner at speeds of up to 25mph by following the car in front of it.

According to Mercedes, the system can tell the difference between regular traffic and some idiot in front of you swerving off the road, or taking a different corner.

I don't care.

I don't care if it can tell the difference between taking a corner, making a turn or a circus trained elephant. Putting something like that in a car is, well, bloody effing stupid.

Have we gotten to the point that people can't be bothered to steer their car? Already we have cruise control systems that will automatically slow the car if traffic slows down. So now we don't have to, I don't know, drive?

It's a bunch of crap.

All of this technology bull that keeps getting shoved in cars is making drivers more stupid. I don't have to look behind me when I back up because I have a camera that does it for me. I don't have to pay attention on the highway because the car will tell me when I'm straying out of my lane. I don't have to worry about when to change my oil because the car tells me when to do it.

Tell me, automakers, how am I driving a car anymore? I'm not controlling it, the damn computer is.

When people don't have to pay attention anymore to their car, they stop caring about it and about driving. They just do stuff, and think that the computer or whatever happens to be in the car will take care of it.

Well, what happens when the computer breaks? Or what if something happens that's outside of the computer's control?

I honestly think that's what's happened with Toyota's cars, to pull that back in here. People are so damn used to the car just doing it's thing that they don't know what to do in case of an emergency. They don't know how anything works anymore, and they don't care because it doesn't need their attention, or so they think.

People, basically, don't know how to drive.

It's sickening, and the damn manufactures aren't helping.

But the genie can't go back into the lamp. Not now. Everyone's clamoring for more tech garbage, and it'll eventually lead to cars that drive themselves.

I won't have any of that. Give me a manual transmission and a set of manual door locks. At least then I'll know that I'm in control, not HAL.

1 comment:

  1. It's been a while since I threw in my counter-point...

    Manual transmission and manual door locks--OK, good start. How about manual windows? Let's add manual choke and manual spark advance. And, let's kill the automatic station search in the radio, the automatic headlamps, and we don't need automatic turn signal cancelling (just follow my Dad for a few miles, you'll see). Should we get rid of the semi-automatic intermittent windshield wipers? Of course, we don't want any car telling us when we should dim the rearview mirror! And how dare the car actively restrain us.

    Many of these automatic and power systems are incorporated for weight, safety, economy, ecology, and (dare we accept it?) convenience factors. The goal is to make the automobile as good a transportation device as possible.

    When Cadillac introduced cruise control in 1957, one argument made against it is that it didn't control for traffic. Our Eisenhower Interstate system took care of a lot of that issue. Radar-sensing cruise control further improves upon it. It still takes a thinking driver to utilize it properly.

    You seem to be most incensed with the self-steering feature of the concept car. (Do you also loathe the parallel-parking feature of some cars?) Since it is a concept car, we may not see the implementation of this feature any time soon (it may be vaporware, like the car's fuel cell).

    I could see such a system implemented in some facet as a way to control traffic and make vehicles even more fuel efficient. Cars could be linked together--they would become trains, and trains are shown to be the most fuel efficient means of motorized transport. If people won't take government provided rail transport, perhaps they would accept having their vehicles act as if it were a train.

    For those who want to drive for the full driving experience, there are cars without power steering, power brakes, automatic transmissions, dimmable mirrors, radios, multi-speed windshield wipers, etc. These are essentially some form of race car--built for the sole purpose of driving and not commuting. On the other hand, most people want a vehicle most of the time for commuting--it's arriving at the destination without the journey inserting itself that's desired.

    Sure, we could do more for ourselves every day. We could buy unsliced bread. We could use washing machines that aren't automatic--the ones that have the wringer attached. Or we could wash our dishes by hand. But automatic clothes washers, automatic dish washers, and sliced bread are not what destroyed society. Technology is morally neutral.

    Most people don't know how to care for horses, hitch wagons, trim candles and oil lamps, build efficient fires, shift manual transmissions, adjust manual chokes or spark timing, or crank start an engine. Society learns or forgets skills as is necessary. This is not bad, just the result of improving (changing) our environment. Having our environment under our control is a God-given right and ability.

    ReplyDelete